Showing posts with label Circumcision. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Circumcision. Show all posts

Sunday, 11 March 2018

Iceland to ban circumcision of males? Circumcision of girls already outlawed.



From the Iceland Monitor of 26 February 2018:

The ban on circumcision in Iceland: Humanity or hypocrisy?


by Roald Eyvindsson
This month Iceland made headlines across the world, following a heated debate about a new bill, currently before the Icelandic parliament (Alþingi), that proposes to ban any kind of mutilation on children, including religious circumcision. If passed into law Iceland would become the first European country to do so.

The MP who put the bill forward, Silja Dögg Gunnarsdóttir of The Progressive Party (Framsókn), claims that non-medical circumcision of baby boys violates their human rights as outlined in the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child. She has compared it to FGM, i.e. female genital mutilation which is already banned in Iceland and has been since 2005.
oooooooo
Male circumcision is integral in both Jewish and Islamic faiths. Within the Christian tradition, circumcision is optional. Often, the parents' choice is influenced by whether the male parent has been circumcised.  The Catholic Church - who is unlikely to be affected greatly - "has expressed concerns over religious persecution".  


Friday, 29 November 2013

Rabbinical court in Israel rejects appeal by a mother who won't have her son circumcised

Rabbinical court rejects appeal by Netanya resident who won’t have her son undergo what she calls ‘mutilation’
 November 26, 2013, 6:08 am

Illustrative photo of a ritual circumcision (photo credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Illustrative photo of a ritual circumcision (photo credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

The Rabbinical Court in Jerusalem rejected an appeal Monday by a Netanya woman fined NIS 500 ($140) per day for refusing to circumcise her son, as is required by Jewish law (halacha).
The penalty was initially levied by a rabbinical court in Netanya earlier this year at the request of the woman’s estranged husband who has demanded that the circumcision take place. The two are reportedly undergoing divorce proceedings, and the court stated that it believes her refusal was part of some ploy to save her marriage.